Bureau of Arms
Control
Washington,
DC
September 8,
2005
Chemical Weapons Convention States Parties and Signatories
The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) bans the development,
production,
acquisition, stockpiling, retention, and direct or indirect transfer
of
Chemical Weapons. It also prohibits the use or preparation for use of CW and
the assistance, encouragement, or inducement of anyone else to engage
in
activities prohibited by the CWC.
The CWC entered into force on April 29, 1997, following ratification by
65
signatories. As of August 29, 2005, 173 countries have either ratified
or
acceded to the CWC. Another 12 are signatories (countries listed below
in
regular type face that are not followed by
dates).
TOTAL States Parties =
173
AFGHANISTAN--RATIFIED 9/24/ GREECE--RATIFIED 12/22/94 PANAMA--RATIFIED
10/7/98
03
GRENADA--RATIFIED 03/06/05 PAPUA
NEW
ALBANIA--RATIFIED 5/11/94 GUINEA--RATIFIED
4/17/96
GUATEMALA--RATIFIED
2/12/03
ALGERIA--RATIFIED 8/14/95 PARAGUAY--RATIFIED
12/1/
GUINEA--RATIFIED 6/9/97
94
ANDORRA--ACCEDED
2/27/03
Guinea-Bissau PERU--RATIFIED
7/20/95
ANTIGUA & BARBUDA--ACCEDED
8
/29/05 GUYANA--RATIFIED 9/12/97
PHILIPPINES--RATIFIED 12/
11/96
ARGENTINA--RATIFIED 10/2/95 Haiti
POLAND--RATIFIED
8/23/95
ARMENIA--RATIFIED 1/27/95 HOLY SEE--RATIFIED
5/12/99
PORTUGAL--RATIFIED
9/10/
AUSTRALIA--RATIFIED 5/6/94 HONDURAS--ACCEDED 8/29/05
96
AUSTRIA--RATIFIED 8/17/95 HUNGARY--RATIFIED 10/31/96 QATAR--RATIFIED
9/3/97
AZERBAIJAN--RATIFIED 2/29/00 ICELAND--RATIFIED 4/28/97 ROMANIA--RATIFIED
2/15/95
Bahamas INDIA--RATIFIED 9/3/96 RUSSIAN
FEDERATION--RATIFIED 11/5
BAHRAIN--RATIFIED 4/28/97 INDONESIA--RATIFIED 11/12/98
/97
BANGLADESH--RATIFIED 4/25/97 IRAN--RATIFIED 11/3/97 RWANDA--RATIFIED
3/31/04
BELARUS--RATIFIED 7/11/96 IRELAND--RATIFIED 6/24/96 SAMOA--RATIFIED
9/27/02
BELGIUM--RATIFIED 1/27/97 Israel ST. KITTS
&
NEVIS--RATIFIED
5/21/04
BELIZE--ACCEDED 12/1/03 ITALY--RATIFIED
12/8/95
ST.
LUCIA--RATIFIED 4/9/
BENIN--RATIFIED 5/14/98 JAMAICA--RATIFIED 9/8/00
97
BHUTAN--ACCEDED 8/18/05 JAPAN--RATIFIED 9/15/95 ST. VINCENT AND
THE
GRENADINES--RATIFIED 9/18
BOLIVIA--RATIFIED 8/14/98 JORDAN--ACCEDED 10/29/97
/02
BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA--RATIFIED KAZAKHSTAN--RATIFIED 3/23/00 SAN
MARINO--RATIFIED 12/
2/25/97
10/99
KENYA--RATIFIED
4/25/97
BOTSWANA--ACCEDED 8/31/98 SAO TOME
&
KIRIBATI--ACCEDED 9/7/00 PRINCIPE--ACCEDED
9/9/03
BRAZIL--RATIFIED
3/13/96
KOREA (Rep of)--RATIFIED 4/ SAUDI
ARABIA--RATIFIED 8/
BRUNEI DARUSSALAM--RATIFIED 28/97
9/96
7/28/97
KUWAIT--RATIFIED 5/29/97 SENEGAL--RATIFIED
7/20/98
BULGARIA--RATIFIED
8/10/94
KYRGYZSTAN--RATIFIED 9/29/03 SERBIA AND
BURKINA FASO--RATIFIED 7/8/
MONTENEGRO--ACCEDED 4/20/
97 LAOS (P.D.R.)--RATIFIED 2/25
00
/97
Burma (Myanmar)
SEYCHELLES--RATIFIED 4/7/
LATVIA--RATIFIED 7/23/96
93
BURUNDI--RATIFIED
9/4/98
LESOTHO--RATIFIED 12/7/94 SIERRA
LEONE--RATIFIED 9/
CAMBODIA--ACCEDED 8/18/05
30/04
Liberia
CAMEROON--RATIFIED 9/16/96
SINGAPORE--RATIFIED 5/21/
LIBYA--ACCEDED 1/6/04
97
CANADA--RATIFIED
9/26/95
LIECHTENSTEIN--RATIFIED 11/ SLOVAKIA--RATIFIED
10/27/
CAPE VERDE--RATIFIED 10/10/ 24/99
95
03
LITHUANIA--RATIFIED 4/15/98 SLOVENIA--RATIFIED
6/11/
Central African Republic
97
LUXEMBOURG--RATIFIED
4/15/97
CHAD--RATIFIED 2/13/04 SOLOMON
ISLANDS--ACCEDED
MACEDONIA--ACCEDED 6/20/97
9/23/04
CHILE--RATIFIED
7/12/96
MADAGASCAR--RATIFIED 10/20/ SOUTH
AFRICA--RATIFIED 9/
CHINA--RATIFIED 4/25/97 04
13/95
COLOMBIA--RATIFIED 4/5/00 MALAWI--RATIFIED 6/11/98 SPAIN--RATIFIED
8/3/94
Comoros MALAYSIA--RATIFIED 4/20/00 SRI
LANKA--RATIFIED 8/19/
94
Congo MALDIVES--RATIFIED
5/31/94
SUDAN--ACCEDED
5/24/99
Congo, Dem. Rep. of MALI--RATIFIED
4/28/97
(formerly Zaire) SURINAM--RATIFIED
4/28/97
MALTA--RATIFIED
4/28/97
COOK ISLANDS--RATIFIED 7/15/
SWAZILAND--RATIFIED 11/20
94 MARSHALL ISLANDS--RATIFIED 5
/96
/19/04
COSTA RICA--RATIFIED 5/31/96 SWEDEN--RATIFIED
6/17/93
MAURITANIA--RATIFIED
2/9/98
COTE D' IVOIRE--RATIFIED 12/
SWITZERLAND--RATIFIED 3/
18/95 MAURITIUS--RATIFIED 2/9/93
10/95
CROATIA--RATIFIED 5/23/95 MEXICO--RATIFIED 8/29/94
TAJIKISTAN--RATIFIED 1/11
/95
CUBA--RATIFIED 4/29/97 MICRONESIA (FED
STATES)
--RATIFIED 6/21/99 TANZANIA--RATIFIED
6/25/
CYPRUS--RATIFIED 8/28/98
98
MOLDOVA (Rep of)--RATIFIED
7
CZECH REPUBLIC--RATIFIED 3/6 /8/96 THAILAND--RATIFIED
12/10/
/96
02
MONACO--RATIFIED
6/1/95
DENMARK--RATIFIED 7/13/95 TIMOR
LESTE--ACCEDED 5/7/
MONGOLIA--RATIFIED 1/17/95
03
Djibouti
MOROCCO--RATIFIED 12/28/95 TOGO--RATIFIED
4/23/97
DOMINICA--RATIFIED
2/12/01
MOZAMBIQUE--ACCEDED 8/15/00 TONGA--ACCEDED
6/23/03
Dominican Republic
NAMIBIA--RATIFIED 11/27/95 TRINIDAD
&
ECUADOR--RATIFIED 9/6/95 TOBAGO--ACCEDED
6/24/97
NAURU (Rep of)--RATIFIED
11/
EL SALVADOR--RATIFIED 10/30/ 12/01 TUNISIA--RATIFIED
4/15/97
95
NEPAL--RATIFIED 11/18/97 TURKEY--RATIFIED
5/12/97
EQUATORIAL GUINEA--RATIFIED
4/25/97 NETHERLANDS--RATIFIED 6/30/
TURKMENISTAN--RATIFIED 9/
95
29/94
ERITREA--ACCEDED
2/14/00
NEW ZEALAND--RATIFIED 7/15/ TUVALU--ACCEDED
1/19/04
ESTONIA--RATIFIED 5/26/99
96
UGANDA--RATIFIED
11/30/01
ETHIOPIA--RATIFIED 5/13/96 NICARAGUA--RATIFIED
11/5/99
UKRAINE--RATIFIED
10/16/
FIJI--RATIFIED 1/20/93 NIGER--RATIFIED 4/9/97
98
FINLAND--RATIFIED 2/7/95 NIGERIA--RATIFIED 5/19/99 UNITED ARAB
EMIRATES--RATIFIED
11/28/
FRANCE--RATIFIED 3/2/95 NIUE--ACCEDED 5/21/05
00
GABON--RATIFIED 9/8/00 NORWAY--RATIFIED 4/7/94 UNITED
KINGDOM--RATIFIED
5/13/96
GAMBIA--RATIFIED 5/19/98 OMAN--RATIFIED
2/8/95
UNITED STATES
OF
GEORGIA--RATIFIED 11/27/95 PAKISTAN--RATIFIED 10/28/97 AMERICA--RATIFIED
4/25/97
GERMANY--RATIFIED 8/12/94 PALAU--ACCEDED 2/3/03 URUGUAY--RATIFIED
10/6/94
GHANA--RATIFIED 7/9/97
UZBEKISTAN--RATIFIED 7/23
/96
VENEZUELA--RATIFIED 12/3/
Bureau of Arms
Control
Washington,
DC
September 8,
2005
United Nations Register of Conventional Arms
The United Nations Register of Conventional Arms is a voluntary
arrangement
established on January 1, 1992, under General Assembly resolution 46/36 L
of
December 9, 1991, entitled "Transparency in Armaments." The resolution
called
upon all member states to provide annually by May 31 of each year, to the
Secretary-General, relevant data on imports and exports of conventional
arms to
be included in the Register. UN Member States are also invited to report
on
their military holdings and procurement through national production and
relevant policies. In the same resolution, the General Assembly declared
its
determination to prevent the excessive and destabilizing accumulation of
arms
in order to promote stability and strengthen international peace and
security,
taking into account the legitimate security needs of States and the
principle
of undiminished security at the lowest possible level of armaments.
The technical procedures for the Register were developed by a Panel of
Experts
appointed by the Secretary-General in 1992. The recommendations by the
Panel
were endorsed by the General Assembly. Periodic reviews of the operation
of the
Register and its further developments have been conducted by the
Secretary-General in 1994, 1997, 2000, and 2003. Paragraph 2 (a) of the
annex
to General Assembly resolution 46/36 L and subsequent General Assembly
resolutions identify the following seven categories of equipment on which
Member States are requested to supply data to the Register: battle
tanks,
armored combat vehicles, large caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft,
attack helicopters, warships, and missiles or missile systems. Resolution
58/54
endorsed the recommendations of the 2003 Group of Governmental Experts,
inter
alia, to expand the Register to include transfers of man-portable air
defense
systems (MANPADS) and artillery between 75 and 100 mm. Based on the Group
of
Experts convened in 1994, 1997, 2000, and 2003, the categories and their
definitions to be used for reporting to the Register are as follows:
I. Battle Tanks: Tracked or wheeled self-propelled armored fighting
vehicles
with high cross-country mobility and a high-level of self
protection,
weighing at least 16.5 metric tons unladen weight, with a high muzzle
velocity direct fire main gun of at least 75 millimeters caliber.
II. Armored Combat Vehicles: Tracked, semi-tracked, or wheeled
self-propelled
vehicles, with armored protection and cross-country capability, either
designed and equipped to transport a squad of four or more infantrymen,
or
armed with an integral or organic weapon of at least 12.5 mm caliber
or a
missile launcher.
III. Large-Caliber Artillery Systems: Guns, howitzers, artillery pieces
combining the characteristics of a gun or a howitzer, mortars
or
multiple-launch rocket systems, capable of engaging surface targets
by
delivering primarily indirect fire, with a caliber of 75 mm and above.
IV. Combat Aircraft: Fixed-wing or variable-geometry wing aircraft
designed,
equipped, or modified to engage targets by employing guided
missiles,
unguided rockets, bombs, guns, cannons, or other weapons of
destruction,
including versions of these aircraft which perform specialized
electronic
warfare, suppression of air defense or reconnaissance missions. The
term
"combat aircraft" does not include primary trainer aircraft, unless
designed, equipped, or modified as described above.
V. Attack Helicopters: Rotary-wing aircraft designed, equipped or
modified to
engage targets by employing guided or unguided anti-armor,
air-to-surface,
air-to-subsurface, or air-to-air weapons and equipped with an
integrated
fire control and aiming system for these weapons, including versions
of
these aircraft which perform specialized reconnaissance or electronic
warfare
missions.
VI. Warships: Vessels or submarines armed and equipped for military use
with a
standard displacement of 750 metric tons or above, and those with
a
standard displacement of less than 750 metric tons, equipped for
launching
missiles with a range of at least 25 kilometers or torpedoes with a
similar
range.
VII. Missiles and Missile Launchers: (a) Guided or unguided rockets,
ballistic,
or cruise missiles capable of delivering a warhead or weapon of
destruction
to a range of at least 25 kilometers, and means designed or modified
specifically for launching such missiles or rockets, if not covered
by
categories I through VI. For the purpose of the Register, this
subcategory
includes remotely piloted vehicles with the characteristics for
missiles as
defined above but does not include ground-to-air missiles. (b)
Man-Portable
Air-Defense Systems (MANPADS).
All Member States, regardless of their size or their prominence, are
invited to
participate in the Register. Those member states with no imports and/or
exports
to annually report can participate by submitting "NIL" returns. Since its
establishment in 1992, 169 states have participated in the Register
by
reporting either on a consistent basis or at least once. In 1993, 95
states
submitted returns; in 1994, 94; in 1995, 98; in 1995, 97; in 1996, 97; in
1997,
94; in 1998, 99; in 1999, 85; in 2000, 100; in 2001, 118; in 2002, 126;
in
2003, 123; and in 2004, 115. Submissions in 2005 have not been completed.
Almost all of the major producers, exporters, and importers of
major
conventional weapons have participated in the Register on a consistent
basis.
It has been estimated that each year the Register is able to capture more
than
95% of the global arms trade in the seven agreed categories of
conventional
weapons.
In 2004, 9 of the 53 African Member States; 33 of the 53 Asian Member
States;
20 of the 22 Eastern European Member States; 21 of the 33 Latin American
and
Caribbean Member States; 29 of the 29 Western European and other Member
States;
and 2 of the 2 non-Member States had submitted reports to the UN Register.
While regional participation has varied from year to year in some
cases,
overall participation has improved, averaging over 120 annual submissions
over
the past four years.
The UN Register of Conventional Arms Report is made available to all
Member
States, encouraging bilateral and regional dialogues on security concerns.
Both
the reporting forms and the data are available at the UN website,
http://
disarmament.un.org/cab/register.html.
For further information
contact:
Nazir Kamal, PhD,
Department for Disarmament Affairs
United Nations,
NY
Tel: (212)
963-6195
Fax: (212)
963-3689
E-Mail: kamaln@un.org
Fact Sheet
Bureau of Arms
Control
Washington,
DC
September 8,
2005
United Nations Standardized Reporting
Instrument for Military Expenditures
On December 12, 1980, the United Nations (UN) General Assembly adopted
resolution 35/142 B, entitled "Reduction of Military Budgets," which
introduced
the UN system for standardized reporting of military expenditures. The
resolution recommended that all Member States make use of the reporting
instrument and report annually to the Secretary-General, and requested the
Secretary-General, in turn, to report on the matter to the General
Assembly on
an annual basis. The reporting instrument covers military related
expenditures
on the operating costs of personnel, operations and maintenance,
procurement
and construction, and research and development. It has been in operation
since
1981.
The purpose of the UN Standardized Reporting Instrument for Military
Expenditures is to contribute to a broad effort to develop a set of
specific
measures for the purpose of facilitating the reduction of military
expenditures. UN General Assembly resolution 58/28 of December 2003
observed
that transparency in military matters is an essential element for building
a
climate of trust and confidence between States worldwide. Also, a better
flow
of objective information on military matters can help relieve
international
tensions and is therefore an important contribution to conflict prevention.
The
UN Standardized Reporting Instrument for Military Expenditures has also
played
an important role in acting as a model for similar reporting instruments,
such
as those used by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
and in
South America between Argentina and
Chile.
Thus far, 120 states have participated in the military expenditure
instrument
on one or more occasions since its inception. On average, more than 70
states
have submitted annual reports during the past four years, representing
over 80%
of the global military expenditure. In 2001, the Secretary-General
received
reports from 61 states compared to fewer than 40 in 2000. In 2002, 82
states
submitted reports; in 2003, 75 states and in 2004, 79 states. This is
a
significant increase considering that only between 20-25 member states of
the
United Nations, on average, chose to submit information on their military
spending during the 1980s. Approximately, 30-35 states have participated
during
the 1990s. Although there has been some improvement recently,
participation by
some regions, most notably Africa remains
minimal.
The UN Standardized Reporting Instrument for Military Expenditures
originated
in the General Assembly resolution 3093 B (XXVIII) of December 7,
1973.
Following a request from the General Assembly in December 1975, the
Secretary
General appointed a Group of Experts to determine the scope, content, and
most
appropriate method of assessing military expenditures. The Group developed
a
definition of military spending, designed a standardized reporting
instrument,
and recommended that Member States begin reporting their military spending
on
the basis of a standardized matrix. In 1978, the General Assembly
requested the
Secretary-General to carry out a pilot reporting exercise, which was
conducted
between 1979 and 1980. Yielding substantive responses from 14 states, the
standardized military expenditure reporting instrument was deemed a
success. As
a consequence, the General Assembly approved the standardized instrument
in
resolution 35/142 B and recommended that all Member States make use of
this
instrument to report their military spending on a yearly basis to the
Secretary-General.
The UN Standardized Reporting Instrument for Military Expenditures is
available
to all member states, encouraging bilateral and regional dialogues on
security
concerns. Both the reporting forms and the data, as well as other
documents,